PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.84%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 33.47%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
16.44%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 35.51%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
26.41%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 155.02%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
13.75%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 155.02%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.48%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 159.36%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.63%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 158.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.55%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.36%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 10.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-99.94%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
83.07%
OCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 218.60%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
86.67%
FCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 337.88%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-2.77%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 85.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
20.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 85.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
68.07%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 85.12%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
175.37%
OCF/share CAGR of 175.37% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
228.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 228.76% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
182.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 182.00% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
102.53%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 185.82%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-1.52%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 185.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
253.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 185.82%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
186.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 186.13% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
1.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 1.13% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
12.65%
Equity/share CAGR of 12.65% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-99.93%
Cut dividends over 10 years while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-99.92%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-99.93%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MPWR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
0.68%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 45.97%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-3.66%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.44%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 7.81%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.15%
Under 50% of MPWR's 17.75%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.83%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
6.90%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 5.89%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
20.35%
We expand SG&A while MPWR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.