PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.06%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 9.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-2.03%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 8.92%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
6.44%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 113.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.44%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 113.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
3.80%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 132.30%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
5.13%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 128.57%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 146.15%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.23%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.50%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
194294.01%
Dividend growth of 194294.01% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-40.03%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-47.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-5.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 53.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
28.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 53.81%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
70.09%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 53.81%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
61.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 61.20% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
49.82%
OCF/share CAGR of 49.82% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
24.02%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 24.02% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
112.59%
Below 50% of MPWR's 416.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
11.83%
Below 50% of MPWR's 416.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
213.01%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of MPWR's 416.44%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
175.31%
Below 50% of MPWR's 691.75%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
2.48%
Below 50% of MPWR's 691.75%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
13.01%
Below 50% of MPWR's 691.75%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
37.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 37.38% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
40.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 40.20% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
35.49%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.49% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
9.93%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 7.86%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.53%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 11.13%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.79%
Under 50% of MPWR's 8.44%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
84.64%
Debt growth of 84.64% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
-5.12%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
4.17%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 82.34%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.