PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.89%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 7.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
14.06%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 8.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
32.73%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 255.91%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
32.73%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 255.91%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
308.03%
Net income growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 359.56%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
316.22%
EPS growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 381.69%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
316.67%
Similar diluted EPS growth to MPWR's 311.27%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-2.02%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 2.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.98%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 16.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.07%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
14.72%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
77.85%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
50.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 95.39%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
109.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 95.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
75.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 17.06%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
278.11%
OCF/share CAGR of 278.11% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
25.75%
OCF/share CAGR of 25.75% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
88.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 88.16% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
2966.45%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 129.03% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1497.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 129.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
2095.75%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 112.95%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
191.78%
Equity/share CAGR of 191.78% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
16.42%
Equity/share CAGR of 16.42% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
30.08%
Equity/share CAGR of 30.08% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
42.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 42.42% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
46.49%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.49% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
41.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 41.39% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
7.29%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 34.08%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
7.14%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 6.24%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.46%
Asset growth above 1.5x MPWR's 1.39%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
16.14%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 6.85%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-86.48%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
0.56%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 7.10%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-0.71%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.