PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.73%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 2.46%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
1.31%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 6.59%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-2.41%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-2.41%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-70.59%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-69.48%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-69.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.03%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.09%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.93%
Dividend growth of 0.93% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-34.43%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 295.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-46.04%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 216.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
57.48%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to MPWR's 60.46%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
125.75%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 60.46%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.50%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
176.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 176.00% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
39.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 39.23% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-6.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 168.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
581.29%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 61.91% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
765.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 61.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
79.28%
Positive short-term CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
194.56%
Equity/share CAGR of 194.56% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
15.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 15.59% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
20.14%
Equity/share CAGR of 20.14% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
40.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 40.48% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
37.98%
Dividend/share CAGR of 37.98% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
41.93%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 41.93% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
8.29%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
11.69%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-7.18%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 5.76%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.02%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 1.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.34%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 8.66%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.35%
SG&A growth well above MPWR's 2.66%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.