PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.92%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-9.52%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-17.63%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 287.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-17.63%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 287.39%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-4.84%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 12.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.13%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 13.17%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.52%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.41%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 2.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
29.35%
Dividend growth of 29.35% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
101.67%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
341.26%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
204.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 19.01%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
111.21%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 19.01%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
120.70%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
37.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 37.20% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
18.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 18.07% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
39.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2571.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 46.48% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
727.64%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 46.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
129.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
187.22%
Below 50% of MPWR's 817.10%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
4.23%
Below 50% of MPWR's 817.10%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
69.04%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1534.04%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
87.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 87.75% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
75.60%
Dividend/share CAGR of 75.60% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
184.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 184.42% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-15.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-3.62%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-5.78%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 3.23%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.10%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.46%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 0.22%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.39%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.