PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.30%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 25.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
8.98%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 26.09%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
18.97%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.97%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
18.22%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.67%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
20.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.35%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 2.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.07%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 2.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
98.97%
Dividend growth of 98.97% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
62.09%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
93.07%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
42.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 112.25%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
109.40%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 112.25%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
29.69%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
58.50%
OCF/share CAGR of 58.50% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
206.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 206.80% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
117.86%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
161.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
748.99%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
69.80%
Positive short-term CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
174.56%
Equity/share CAGR of 174.56% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
33.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 33.59% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
13.44%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.44% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
271.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 271.51% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
247.95%
Dividend/share CAGR of 247.95% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
281.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 281.54% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
8.03%
AR growth well above MPWR's 3.07%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.06%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 27.59%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
1.96%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 7.19%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.22%
Positive BV/share change while MPWR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.18%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 8.36%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
4.69%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 14.88%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.