PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.98%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 30.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
11.21%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 30.33%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
25.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 216.73%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
25.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 216.73%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
27.21%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 241.09%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
30.95%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 240.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
28.57%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 225.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.39%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.43%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 14.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.53%
Dividend growth of 0.53% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
70.49%
OCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 28.56%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
90.47%
FCF growth 75-90% of MPWR's 105.14%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
59.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 119.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
96.53%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 119.90%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
37.60%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
205.28%
OCF/share CAGR of 205.28% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
226.83%
OCF/share CAGR of 226.83% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
98.43%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-50.56%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 270.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
397.85%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 270.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
68.28%
Below 50% of MPWR's 267.08%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
92.20%
Equity/share CAGR of 92.20% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
21.10%
Equity/share CAGR of 21.10% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
5.44%
Below 50% of MPWR's 408.39%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
288.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 288.56% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
278.60%
Dividend/share CAGR of 278.60% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
286.61%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 286.61% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.64%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 59.30%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.83%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 32.64%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.11%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 13.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.74%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 16.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.63%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 16.51%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.18%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 13.37%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.