PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.92%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.87%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.68%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2.71%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.18%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 2.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.45%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
25.02%
Dividend growth of 25.02% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.05%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 202.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-9.93%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 321.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
66.42%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 58.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
96.86%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 58.08%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
41.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 117.45%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
241.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 241.13% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
127.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 127.23% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
37.02%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 910.12%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
401.02%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 317.83%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
252.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 317.83%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
93.61%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1820.28%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
91.65%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1108.22%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
10.40%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1108.22%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-4.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 80.80%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
361.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 361.20% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
355.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 355.42% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
294.10%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 294.10% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.89%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.21%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 10.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.70%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 9.48%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.50%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 11.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.09%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.63%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 0.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.