PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.45%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-33.23%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-87.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-93.30%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-80.99%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-79.07%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-79.07%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.76%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.28%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
9.57%
Dividend growth of 9.57% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
6.27%
OCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 496.83%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
21.75%
FCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 732.30%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
121.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 39.78%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
81.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-13.17%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
367.14%
OCF/share CAGR of 367.14% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
111.98%
Below 50% of MPWR's 292.22%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
54.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 221.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
0.30%
Below 50% of MPWR's 194.16%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-57.80%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 71.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-79.55%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
153.14%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1320.42%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
59.03%
Below 50% of MPWR's 2430.82%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-2.17%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 79.40%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
656.97%
Dividend/share CAGR of 656.97% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
692.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 692.36% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
267.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 267.82% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-48.53%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-12.70%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-4.36%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.95%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.99%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-7.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.