PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.26%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-26.53%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
22.34%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-80.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-84.11%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-88.89%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-88.89%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.47%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.62%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.47%
Dividend growth of 0.47% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-77.55%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-80.02%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
28.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 164.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-3.43%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-22.22%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
45.03%
OCF/share CAGR of 45.03% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-13.19%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-43.98%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-91.64%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 86.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-93.70%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 95.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-96.39%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
72.90%
Equity/share CAGR of 72.90% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
3.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 3.59% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
1.88%
Below 50% of MPWR's 76.01%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
435.74%
Dividend/share CAGR of 435.74% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
417.97%
Dividend/share CAGR of 417.97% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
265.17%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 265.17% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
23.22%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 46.65%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-20.15%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.38%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 2.41%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.78%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 2.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.44%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-15.75%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.