PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.79%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 40.42%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
39.45%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 44.16%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
272.17%
EBIT growth 50-75% of MPWR's 383.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
3330.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 383.70%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
1429.41%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 537.64%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
2000.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 516.67%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
1900.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 516.67%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.63%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.39%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 7.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.80%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
121.91%
OCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 2522.62%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
144.71%
FCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 2100.46%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
29.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 161.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
5.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-18.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 33.62%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
128.04%
OCF/share CAGR of 128.04% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
53.26%
Positive OCF/share growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
6.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 275.96%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-0.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 175.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.92%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 186.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-86.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 159.72%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
73.41%
Equity/share CAGR of 73.41% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
3.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 3.13% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-11.69%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 73.88%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
417.19%
Dividend/share CAGR of 417.19% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
423.04%
Dividend/share CAGR of 423.04% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
262.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 262.50% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
10.58%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-3.19%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 8.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.09%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 8.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.66%
Under 50% of MPWR's 5.56%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.40%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 19.90%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
7.21%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 19.38%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.