PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.22%
Revenue growth similar to MPWR's 16.50%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
31.76%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 19.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
80.61%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 328.36%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
122.45%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 328.36%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
106.92%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 294.29%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
104.76%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 300.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
110.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 277.78%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.95%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.31%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 2.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.23%
Dividend growth of 0.23% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
49.73%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
19.45%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
61.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 143.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-8.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 51.46%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
110.74%
OCF/share CAGR of 110.74% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
22.04%
Positive OCF/share growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
138.85%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
79.23%
Below 50% of MPWR's 319.97%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
31.73%
Below 50% of MPWR's 316.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-8.03%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 677.51%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
59.53%
Equity/share CAGR of 59.53% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
0.89%
Below 50% of MPWR's 690.16%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-5.83%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 88.93%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
460.05%
Dividend/share CAGR of 460.05% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
428.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 428.42% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
260.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 260.00% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
15.35%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 56.60%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
4.99%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 1.37%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.41%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 5.97%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
3.42%
Under 50% of MPWR's 10.29%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.27%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 3.58%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
3.98%
SG&A growth well above MPWR's 1.26%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.