PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.34%
Positive revenue growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.29%
Positive gross profit growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
14.75%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
14.68%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.75%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.26%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.81%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.04%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.63%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
9.10%
Dividend growth of 9.10% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
20.02%
OCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 284.60%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-7.07%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 32290.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
54.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 79.93%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
32.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 147.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
2.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 51.19%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
42.74%
OCF/share CAGR of 42.74% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
6.47%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1146.24%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
40.02%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 235.18%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
99.29%
Below 50% of MPWR's 230.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
85.55%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1046.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
15.90%
Below 50% of MPWR's 343.01%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
45.75%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1663.51%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
3.31%
Below 50% of MPWR's 163.89%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.15%
Below 50% of MPWR's 92.29%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
508.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 508.03% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
370.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 370.06% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
203.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 203.64% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-11.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
7.71%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.81%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 5.41%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.09%
Similar to MPWR's 4.43%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.80%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 2.84%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
2.35%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 40.77%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.