PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.66%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 7.96%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
6.29%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 7.16%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
8.23%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 42.41%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.57%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 42.41%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.46%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 36.57%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.11%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 6.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.73%
Dividend growth of 0.73% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-29.07%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-13.10%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
53.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 331.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
48.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 166.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 76.53%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
133.79%
OCF/share CAGR of 133.79% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
87.28%
Below 50% of MPWR's 399.70%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
49.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 24.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
106.89%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 208.06%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
120.86%
Below 50% of MPWR's 447.50%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
49.13%
Below 50% of MPWR's 8722.16%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
15.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 15.89% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
13.63%
Below 50% of MPWR's 178.53%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.63%
Below 50% of MPWR's 94.61%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
463.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 463.52% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
378.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 378.03% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
200.44%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 200.44% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
19.50%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 58.11%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
6.16%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.07%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 7.23%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.59%
Under 50% of MPWR's 6.18%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.52%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 6.50%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.16%
We expand SG&A while MPWR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.