PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.08%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 10.83%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
12.14%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 10.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
15.73%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MPWR's 8.10%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
16.53%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 8.10%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
16.87%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 0.80%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
18.87%
EPS growth of 18.87% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
19.23%
Diluted EPS growth of 19.23% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-2.03%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 2.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.01%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 1.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.70%
Dividend growth of 0.70% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-20.85%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 76.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-43.18%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 14.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
74.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 231.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
45.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 91.13%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
21.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 56.19%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
24.50%
OCF/share CAGR of 24.50% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-8.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 344.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-25.55%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 315.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-15.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 242.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
65.53%
Below 50% of MPWR's 172.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
49.96%
Below 50% of MPWR's 186.92%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
9.16%
Equity/share CAGR of 9.16% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
15.04%
Below 50% of MPWR's 221.91%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
0.96%
Below 50% of MPWR's 113.72%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
513.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 513.01% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
384.68%
Dividend/share CAGR of 384.68% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
52.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 52.06% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.39%
AR growth well above MPWR's 23.56%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.72%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.67%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 9.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.55%
Under 50% of MPWR's 6.59%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 6.75%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.29%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 15.74%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.