PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.98%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 18.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.66%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 10.95%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
11.16%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 97.40%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
10.84%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 97.40%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
11.70%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 106.32%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
12.70%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 105.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.52%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 105.88%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.99%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.05%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.75%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
134.52%
OCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 6.76%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
230.47%
FCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 81.46%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
72.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 218.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
42.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 72.08%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
22.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 44.87%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
292.55%
OCF/share CAGR of 292.55% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
19.41%
Below 50% of MPWR's 51.50%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
3.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 252.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
83.88%
Below 50% of MPWR's 321.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
86.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 157.54%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
32.48%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 29.97%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
16.38%
Equity/share CAGR of 16.38% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
15.09%
Below 50% of MPWR's 177.88%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
7.05%
Below 50% of MPWR's 86.75%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
493.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 493.84% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
784467.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 784467.57% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
50.12%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 50.12% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.27%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 6.49%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
5.56%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 34.59%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
3.99%
Asset growth above 1.5x MPWR's 2.59%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.19%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 1.65%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.38%
We increase R&D while MPWR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.44%
We expand SG&A while MPWR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.