PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.75%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.29%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.24%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
0.24%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.66%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
11.27%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.45%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.01%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.59%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
8.09%
Dividend growth of 8.09% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-6.68%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
0.76%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
72.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 81.74%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
34.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 18.16%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
16.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 14.97%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
177.75%
OCF/share CAGR of 177.75% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
85.39%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 52.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1.19%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
120.11%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 200.00%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
96.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
46.06%
Positive short-term CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
22.64%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1942.80%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
19.66%
Below 50% of MPWR's 158.01%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
22.49%
Below 50% of MPWR's 69.07%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
511.63%
Dividend/share CAGR of 511.63% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
336.24%
Dividend/share CAGR of 336.24% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.79%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.79% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.45%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.74%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 32.53%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.95%
Positive asset growth while MPWR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.84%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 0.68%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-0.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.