PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.95%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 16.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 19.07%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.33%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 110.80%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.33%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 110.80%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.90%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 83.94%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.79%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.82%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.94%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.03%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
22.29%
OCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 61.41%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
10.25%
FCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 113.94%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
163.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 229.53%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
25.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 68.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 22.13%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
66.82%
OCF/share CAGR of 66.82% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
32.66%
Below 50% of MPWR's 313.61%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
38.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 37.41%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
628.47%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 182.94% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-62.18%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 185.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
30.50%
Positive short-term CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
33.35%
Equity/share CAGR of 33.35% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
14.54%
Below 50% of MPWR's 120.84%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
24.70%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 48.08%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
528.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 528.07% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
328.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 328.75% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.76% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.63%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.01%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 6.91%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
28.46%
Positive asset growth while MPWR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.09%
Positive BV/share change while MPWR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.47%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 11.41%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.79%
SG&A growth well above MPWR's 0.39%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.