PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.74%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 6.37%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-1.10%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 5.99%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
3.79%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 32.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.77%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 32.64%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-11.07%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 22.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-11.54%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 25.17%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 11.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.62%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 1.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MPWR's 4.20%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.42%
Dividend growth of 0.42% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-53.76%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-57.70%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
183.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 349.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
23.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 84.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
66.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 70.11%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
152.15%
OCF/share CAGR of 152.15% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
2.25%
Positive OCF/share growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
99.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 1362.96%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1259.23%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 152.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-35.21%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 4217.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
1638.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 506.47%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
55.33%
Equity/share CAGR of 55.33% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
23.79%
Below 50% of MPWR's 124.99%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
34.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 49.24%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
776.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 776.07% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
324.16%
Dividend/share CAGR of 324.16% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
54.27%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 54.27% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-4.34%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 32.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
3.64%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 7.18%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.38%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 6.32%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.47%
Under 50% of MPWR's 3.82%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-5.49%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
7.38%
We increase R&D while MPWR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.05%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 17.34%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.