PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.86%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 16.09%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.84%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 18.03%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
55.61%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 112.04%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
50.63%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 112.04%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
68.30%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 120.10%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
65.22%
EPS growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 111.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
72.73%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 125.00%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-0.26%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.94%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 1.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.26%
Dividend growth of 0.26% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
50.33%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
52.89%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
157.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 265.24%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
22.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 72.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
50.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 39.90%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
190.70%
OCF/share CAGR of 190.70% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-5.25%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 81.93%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
34.69%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
682.46%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 253.31% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-7.84%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 193.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
90.65%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of MPWR's 103.35%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
63.47%
Equity/share CAGR of 63.47% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
22.37%
Below 50% of MPWR's 140.99%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
34.60%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 47.00%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
643.71%
Dividend/share CAGR of 643.71% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
113.74%
Dividend/share CAGR of 113.74% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
55.92%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 55.92% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
10.22%
AR growth well above MPWR's 7.36%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.73%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 36.70%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.44%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 6.49%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.05%
Under 50% of MPWR's 3.97%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-11.01%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-5.70%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 12.14%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.30%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 1.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.