PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.65%
Positive revenue growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.39%
Positive gross profit growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
44.97%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
40.47%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
75.78%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
78.95%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
76.32%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.88%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.13%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 1.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.37%
Dividend growth of 0.37% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
78.07%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
98.87%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
128.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 181.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
16.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 28.01%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
30.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 15.82%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
221.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 221.77% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-1.55%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
60.07%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
530.73%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 201.93% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
26.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
61.84%
Positive short-term CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
55.49%
Equity/share CAGR of 55.49% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
28.39%
Below 50% of MPWR's 116.34%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
34.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 39.19%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
707.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 707.91% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
113.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 113.40% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
56.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.13% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-0.37%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.96%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 10.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.09%
Asset growth above 1.5x MPWR's 1.68%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.10%
50-75% of MPWR's 4.43%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
20.99%
Debt growth of 20.99% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
-3.54%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-0.66%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.