PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.12%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-16.95%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-79.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-83.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-66.33%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-66.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-65.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.50%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.49%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
22.98%
Dividend growth of 22.98% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-9.73%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 889.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-5.99%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 297.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
103.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 83.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
3.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 16.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
10.62%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 1.94%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
113.57%
OCF/share CAGR of 113.57% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-6.01%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
20.95%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
165.64%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 106.82% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-56.90%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-55.02%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
49.55%
Below 50% of MPWR's 2005.14%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
35.46%
Below 50% of MPWR's 74.23%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
25.81%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 19.37%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
856.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 856.00% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
109.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 109.92% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
76.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.00% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-24.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-4.92%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.19%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.41%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.07%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-8.21%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 10.66%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.08%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 16.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.