PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.62%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 12.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
14.26%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 12.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
51.57%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 113.19%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
129.37%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 113.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
82.32%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 119.65%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
84.37%
EPS growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 114.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
81.25%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 100.00%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
-0.36%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 2.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.53%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 1.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
33.67%
Dividend growth of 33.67% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
87.22%
OCF growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 131.40%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
109.06%
FCF growth 50-75% of MPWR's 149.22%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
104.15%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to MPWR's 101.61%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
8.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 24.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-4.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 1.50%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
179.43%
OCF/share CAGR of 179.43% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
55.41%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 46.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
31.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 4.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
754.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 153.26% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
34.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 7.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-6.00%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
58.52%
Equity/share CAGR of 58.52% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
32.67%
Below 50% of MPWR's 75.06%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
24.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 15.18%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
1208.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1208.79% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
180.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 180.15% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
130.21%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 130.21% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
11.85%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.18%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 15.22%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.54%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.43%
Under 50% of MPWR's 4.11%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-9.11%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-7.16%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 2.93%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
2.61%
SG&A growth well above MPWR's 4.04%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.