PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.47%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 13.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
13.31%
Gross profit growth similar to MPWR's 14.12%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
37.52%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 76.15%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-6.84%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 76.15%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 35.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-5.08%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-3.45%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 35.71%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.63%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 2.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.54%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 2.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.31%
Dividend growth of 0.31% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
70.77%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
77.99%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
100.90%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 30.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
13.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 19.41%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-6.30%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
254.02%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 140.64%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
30.17%
Below 50% of MPWR's 106.33%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-5.66%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
120.73%
Below 50% of MPWR's 623.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
32.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-20.90%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
51.69%
Equity/share CAGR of 51.69% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
30.26%
Below 50% of MPWR's 75.23%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
19.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 19.56%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
1205.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1205.79% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
179.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 179.73% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
132.68%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 132.68% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.21%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 8.06%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
0.35%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 6.72%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-0.79%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 5.25%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.48%
Under 50% of MPWR's 5.51%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.08%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-5.40%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 1.32%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.27%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 0.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.