PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.01%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.42%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 13.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
0.44%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 13.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.35%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 15.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-4.35%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.46%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.54%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.15%
Dividend growth of 0.15% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-61.47%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-64.74%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
62.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 48.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
68.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 79.41%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
-5.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 22.97%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
88.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
117.10%
Below 50% of MPWR's 2399.45%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-3.34%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 32.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
112.73%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 152.41%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
3278.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 1185.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-21.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 333.71%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
40.88%
Equity/share CAGR of 40.88% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
36.00%
Below 50% of MPWR's 73.79%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
8.43%
Below 50% of MPWR's 25.26%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1308.17%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1308.17% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
171.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 171.86% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
129.32%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 129.32% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.64%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-0.98%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.02%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 1.55%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.28%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 3.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
9.58%
Debt growth of 9.58% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
5.78%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 24.95%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.90%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 17.73%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.