PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.60%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 10.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
3.58%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 11.20%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
5.30%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 72.63%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.43%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 72.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
6.10%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 32.47%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
6.45%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 33.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
6.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 26.67%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.99%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 1.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.94%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.43%
Dividend growth under 50% of MPWR's 34.65%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
34.65%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
43.00%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
57.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 156.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 34.08%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
6.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 21.70%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
56.58%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 115.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
70.44%
Positive OCF/share growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
33.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 10.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
75.01%
Below 50% of MPWR's 182.43%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
5.73%
Below 50% of MPWR's 13.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
72.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 4.97%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
40.58%
Below 50% of MPWR's 319.00%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
22.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 30.16%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
0.82%
Below 50% of MPWR's 15.43%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1263.46%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1263.46% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
181.31%
Dividend/share CAGR of 181.31% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
100.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 100.13% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.87%
AR growth well above MPWR's 5.61%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
2.22%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 21.66%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
1.07%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 1.95%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-0.60%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 1.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.30%
Debt growth of 5.30% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
-5.33%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
7.06%
SG&A growth well above MPWR's 2.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.