PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.00%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.56%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.77%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.89%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
4.76%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
3.90%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
5.26%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.82%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.77%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 1.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
11.84%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 1.20%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
1.49%
OCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 10.37%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-0.31%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
40.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 92.96%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
4.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 63.30%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 61.80%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
149.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 219.92%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
34.74%
Below 50% of MPWR's 110.06%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
45.06%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 90.57%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
102.44%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2.85%
Below 50% of MPWR's 149.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
248.52%
Below 50% of MPWR's 3558.56%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
32.16%
Below 50% of MPWR's 240.48%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
10.44%
Below 50% of MPWR's 31.96%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-0.13%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 28.05%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
1175.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1175.51% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
192.39%
Dividend/share CAGR of 192.39% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
80.78%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while MPWR cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-21.34%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 1.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.52%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.87%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.58%
Under 50% of MPWR's 4.01%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.29%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-3.16%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-6.68%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.