PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.10%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.45%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
8.36%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 16.94%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-5.45%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 16.94%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
8.16%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 15.31%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
4.00%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 17.14%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
4.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 14.71%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.51%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MPWR's 1.21%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
31.30%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.43%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-1.84%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
0.24%
FCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 1.60%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
45.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 189.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
13.86%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 80.88%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
22.94%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 53.38%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
141.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 453.18%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
62.92%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 93.60%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
26.13%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
131.02%
Below 50% of MPWR's 843.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
300.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 459.80%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
123.41%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 107.94%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
35.88%
Below 50% of MPWR's 234.38%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
9.07%
Below 50% of MPWR's 47.07%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
5.67%
Below 50% of MPWR's 25.42%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1168.08%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1168.08% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
194.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 194.90% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.90% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-12.44%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 2.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.00%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.33%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 3.29%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.34%
50-75% of MPWR's 3.18%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-0.06%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-2.83%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-7.01%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.