PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.55%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 11.79%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
10.73%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 12.00%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
18.30%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MPWR's 10.32%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
18.21%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 10.32%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
5.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.71%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
6.06%
EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 2.86%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
6.19%
Similar diluted EPS growth to MPWR's 6.06%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-0.40%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.39%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.00%
Dividend growth under 50% of MPWR's 4.88%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
15.35%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 13.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
14.67%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
55.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 176.35%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
27.00%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 60.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
20.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 53.48%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
47.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 525.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
55.81%
Below 50% of MPWR's 243.65%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
27.49%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
150.27%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 278.88%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
171.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 91.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
66.59%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of MPWR's 119.71%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
34.68%
Below 50% of MPWR's 255.75%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
10.06%
Below 50% of MPWR's 47.62%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.24%
Below 50% of MPWR's 32.55%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
526.04%
Dividend/share CAGR of 526.04% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
192.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 192.90% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.12%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.12% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
9.87%
AR growth well above MPWR's 10.15%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.64%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 17.99%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.88%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 5.82%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.05%
Under 50% of MPWR's 4.32%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
6.70%
Debt growth of 6.70% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
2.44%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 7.40%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-1.14%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 17.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.