PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.89%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.13%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-13.11%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 5.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-12.58%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 5.12%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-73.23%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-72.87%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-73.02%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.30%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.10%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 1.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
23.81%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 2.23%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
12.02%
OCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 58.48%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
10.55%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
46.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 166.40%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
42.24%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 129.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
21.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 59.59%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
88.82%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 259.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
100.89%
Below 50% of MPWR's 298.25%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
61.14%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 142.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-36.54%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is at 30.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
47.24%
Below 50% of MPWR's 4062.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-55.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 27.17%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
44.34%
Below 50% of MPWR's 201.15%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
6.56%
Below 50% of MPWR's 72.84%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
5.71%
Below 50% of MPWR's 40.66%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
516.71%
Dividend/share CAGR of 516.71% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
193.79%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while MPWR is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
82.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 38.43%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-18.91%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.57%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.21%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 7.67%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-5.64%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 2.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
13.79%
Debt growth of 13.79% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
2.93%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 1.34%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-0.73%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.