205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.02%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 8.22%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
7.03%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 8.49%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
10.15%
EBIT growth 75-90% of MPWR's 12.91%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
10.59%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of MPWR's 12.91%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 10.75%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.62%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 9.62%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.70%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 12.24%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.61%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.80%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.21%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 56.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
64.21%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 56.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
70.86%
FCF growth 50-75% of MPWR's 122.90%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
61.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 164.94%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
48.84%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 112.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
31.55%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 60.82%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
375.35%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 110.69%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
205.86%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 43.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
135.70%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 210.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
222.83%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 313.99%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
140.33%
Below 50% of MPWR's 286.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
113.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of MPWR's 187.09%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
43.90%
Below 50% of MPWR's 202.49%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
8.47%
Below 50% of MPWR's 72.80%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.29%
Below 50% of MPWR's 52.91%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
520.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 520.27% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
121.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 121.41% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
81.19%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 54.07%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
6.67%
AR growth well above MPWR's 10.82%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
2.85%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 15.20%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.83%
Asset growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.18%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.54%
Under 50% of MPWR's 2.94%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
24.23%
Debt growth of 24.23% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
-0.26%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 8.66%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.85%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 4.55%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.