PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.77%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.16%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-21.48%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.73%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-21.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.65%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.92%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
24.31%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 1.14%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
1.85%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
4.95%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
100.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 249.80%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
39.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 117.96%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
23.68%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 64.74%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
157.89%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 81.60%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
103.87%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 41.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
59.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 82.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
1456.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 575.97% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
176.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 232.63%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
57.27%
Below 50% of MPWR's 155.04%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
29.63%
Below 50% of MPWR's 207.51%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-5.16%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 78.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-4.04%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 62.03%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
601.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 601.64% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
157.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 157.27% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
102.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 50.57%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-23.85%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
4.77%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-7.73%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 3.97%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.04%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 4.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.02%
Debt growth of 0.02% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
2.56%
We increase R&D while MPWR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.55%
We expand SG&A while MPWR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.