PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.81%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 11.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
3.64%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 11.94%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
4.17%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 49.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.51%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 49.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
9.20%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 42.70%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.14%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 41.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 42.22%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.21%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.31%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.08%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while MPWR cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
10.91%
OCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 64.39%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
21.89%
FCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 153.81%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
75.75%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 180.79%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 92.99%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 48.62%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
220.59%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 1277.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
63.29%
Below 50% of MPWR's 305.15%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
50.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 106.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
255.52%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 87.53% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
95.58%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 135.67%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
57.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of MPWR's 92.55%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
27.78%
Below 50% of MPWR's 191.02%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-2.72%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 92.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-6.47%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 65.35%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
601.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 601.27% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
156.24%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 174.92%. Bill Ackman wants more robust earnings or a higher payout ratio to match the competitor.
102.09%
3Y dividend/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 105.25%. Walter Schloss finds parallel short-term dividend strategies for both companies.
-5.43%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 5.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.50%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 5.53%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
6.11%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 3.82%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.19%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 26.03%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-2.82%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 0.72%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.