PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.27%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.78%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 2.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.40%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 2.20%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.91%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 9.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 10.29%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-24.83%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 9.37%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.21%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.21%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 1.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
16.89%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.01%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-11.95%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-13.67%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
48.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 188.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
14.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 96.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 50.72%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
133.26%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 204.11%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
54.69%
Below 50% of MPWR's 164.96%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
35.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 84.27%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
117.46%
Below 50% of MPWR's 460.74%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
45.49%
Below 50% of MPWR's 226.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
9.10%
Below 50% of MPWR's 83.31%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
21.96%
Below 50% of MPWR's 192.22%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-3.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 99.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-9.21%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 68.04%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
651.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 651.36% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
165.01%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 184.92%. Bill Ackman wants more robust earnings or a higher payout ratio to match the competitor.
79.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 106.39%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
-19.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.91%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.14%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 4.39%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.66%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 4.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.85%
We increase R&D while MPWR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.26%
We expand SG&A while MPWR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.