PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.63%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-0.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-2.53%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 0.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.40%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 0.95%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
9.72%
Net income growth comparable to MPWR's 10.23%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
10.53%
EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 6.67%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
10.71%
Similar diluted EPS growth to MPWR's 10.00%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-0.21%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 2.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.53%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.21%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while MPWR cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-51.48%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-56.63%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
37.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 162.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
18.56%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 98.30%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 52.52%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
58.74%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 397.63%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
56.76%
Below 50% of MPWR's 188.44%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
14.75%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 116.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
136.30%
Below 50% of MPWR's 348.23%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
100.76%
Below 50% of MPWR's 427.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
26.23%
Below 50% of MPWR's 128.05%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
4.46%
Below 50% of MPWR's 183.08%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-16.33%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 107.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-22.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 66.44%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
647.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 647.52% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
165.01%
Similar 5Y dividend/share CAGR to MPWR's 161.64%. Walter Schloss sees parallel philosophies in mid-term capital returns.
80.30%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 96.74%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
22.53%
AR growth well above MPWR's 3.11%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.10%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 3.14%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-4.08%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 5.35%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-12.98%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 2.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
6.76%
We have some new debt while MPWR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-2.33%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
1.21%
We expand SG&A while MPWR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.