PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.79%
Positive revenue growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.87%
Positive gross profit growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
20.72%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.68%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
24.76%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
24.49%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
24.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.22%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.32%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MPWR's 1.37%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
13.33%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 0.03%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
47.26%
OCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 2.90%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
47.49%
FCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 17.97%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
47.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 284.18%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
40.65%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 135.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
16.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 65.80%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
120.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 503.22%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
63.52%
Below 50% of MPWR's 187.16%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
18.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 37.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
128.52%
Below 50% of MPWR's 829.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
122.19%
Below 50% of MPWR's 272.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
425.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 227.16%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
12.26%
Below 50% of MPWR's 203.71%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
1.64%
Below 50% of MPWR's 130.15%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-4.74%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MPWR is at 70.51%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
681.02%
Dividend/share CAGR of 681.02% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
167.12%
Similar 5Y dividend/share CAGR to MPWR's 152.13%. Walter Schloss sees parallel philosophies in mid-term capital returns.
64.37%
Below 50% of MPWR's 147.79%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
1.58%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-5.65%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 6.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.28%
Asset growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.06%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
10.11%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 5.27%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
4.74%
Debt growth far above MPWR's 0.16%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
0.52%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 12.02%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-2.21%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 3.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.