PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.23%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 9.19%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
5.71%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 9.45%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
0.51%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 15.32%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.95%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 15.32%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
3.85%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 5.89%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
3.83%
EPS growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 5.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
3.89%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 5.56%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.33%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MPWR's 0.78%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.32%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.23%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.01%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-12.94%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-19.39%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
60.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 340.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
55.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 164.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
20.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 81.54%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
353.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 620.75%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
269.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 134.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
77.37%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 335.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
233.16%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1746.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
169.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 277.81%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
36.82%
Below 50% of MPWR's 91.45%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
21.69%
Below 50% of MPWR's 223.29%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
13.46%
Below 50% of MPWR's 135.29%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
1.85%
Below 50% of MPWR's 68.60%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
677.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 677.64% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
167.94%
Similar 5Y dividend/share CAGR to MPWR's 158.91%. Walter Schloss sees parallel philosophies in mid-term capital returns.
64.02%
Below 50% of MPWR's 159.29%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
12.02%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 25.76%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-3.32%
Inventory is declining while MPWR stands at 11.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.49%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 8.25%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
10.30%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.88%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-12.21%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 74.48%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.52%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
6.78%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 14.04%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.