PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.07%
Revenue growth similar to MPWR's 4.01%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
6.28%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
8.28%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MPWR's 1.87%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
8.59%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 1.87%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
9.81%
Net income growth above 1.5x MPWR's 5.67%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
9.48%
EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 5.33%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
9.66%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.86%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MPWR's 0.37%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.62%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 0.11%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-2.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-44.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
73.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 418.68%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
52.56%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 186.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
34.08%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 101.78%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
198.43%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MPWR's 55.54%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
83.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
13.33%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
782.06%
Below 50% of MPWR's 2067.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
120.11%
Below 50% of MPWR's 287.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
77.97%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of MPWR's 142.01%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
49.67%
Below 50% of MPWR's 274.69%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
37.23%
Below 50% of MPWR's 154.78%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
52.90%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 78.88%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
576.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 576.51% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.41%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 198.73%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
48.82%
Below 50% of MPWR's 101.31%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
2.90%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 31.25%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
2.52%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 24.68%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
6.03%
Similar asset growth to MPWR's 6.01%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
9.61%
1.25-1.5x MPWR's 6.60%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
6.03%
Debt growth far above MPWR's 0.47%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
0.26%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 10.20%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-1.94%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 8.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.