PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.51%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 12.25%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.75%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 12.90%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
2.63%
EBIT growth below 50% of MPWR's 22.35%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.40%
Operating income growth under 50% of MPWR's 22.35%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.95%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 9.49%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
3.03%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 8.23%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
3.96%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 9.27%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.11%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.21%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.20%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 0.03%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-9.04%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 280.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
58.23%
FCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 659.11%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
94.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 449.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
55.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 232.76%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
38.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 146.04%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
491.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 1168.93%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
191.60%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 333.84%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
97.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 154.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
928.53%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 1851.67%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
138.70%
Below 50% of MPWR's 385.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
83.99%
Below 50% of MPWR's 179.85%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
56.79%
Below 50% of MPWR's 282.37%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.46%
Below 50% of MPWR's 159.91%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
67.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 79.51%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
575.06%
Dividend/share CAGR of 575.06% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.88%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 211.61%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
49.37%
Below 50% of MPWR's 108.00%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
5.53%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 14.79%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
7.85%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 19.90%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.43%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 8.08%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.24%
75-90% of MPWR's 5.95%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-5.65%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
0.51%
We increase R&D while MPWR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.46%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 9.71%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.