PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.56%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 7.47%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.22%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 7.36%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.70%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 7.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.65%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 7.04%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.17%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 8.42%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.21%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 8.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
0.82%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 8.44%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.76%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.75%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.09%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
56.45%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
68.74%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
91.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 557.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
37.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 240.16%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
42.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 171.41%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
184.81%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
73.82%
Positive OCF/share growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
42.20%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
262.30%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1475.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
93.27%
Below 50% of MPWR's 365.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
64.93%
Below 50% of MPWR's 289.42%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
57.46%
Below 50% of MPWR's 302.99%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.87%
Below 50% of MPWR's 168.07%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
65.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 92.75%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
570.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 570.52% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
129.76%
Below 50% of MPWR's 280.05%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
49.28%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 87.84%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-6.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 5.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
9.32%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 10.51%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.40%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 8.15%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
3.73%
50-75% of MPWR's 7.21%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
9.57%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MPWR's 67.14%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
4.11%
R&D dropping or stable vs. MPWR's 17.73%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
2.13%
We expand SG&A while MPWR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.