PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.89%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.65%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-17.85%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-14.51%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.94%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.77%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.77%
Share reduction while MPWR is at 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.76%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
7.68%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 0.04%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-26.17%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 387.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-45.60%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 254.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
92.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 622.11%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
35.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 214.52%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
43.56%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 155.43%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
131.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 244.70%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
15.09%
Positive OCF/share growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
19.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
812.98%
Below 50% of MPWR's 36244.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
520.08%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 773.07%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
88.83%
Below 50% of MPWR's 239.92%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
63.37%
Below 50% of MPWR's 388.93%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
53.31%
Below 50% of MPWR's 182.87%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
68.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 99.73%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
487.06%
Stable or rising dividend while MPWR is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
99.82%
Below 50% of MPWR's 271.89%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
37.51%
Below 50% of MPWR's 80.68%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-7.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 19.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
14.68%
Inventory growth well above MPWR's 12.54%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.41%
Asset growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 6.61%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
1.26%
Under 50% of MPWR's 8.66%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
14.39%
We have some new debt while MPWR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.70%
We increase R&D while MPWR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-0.46%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.