205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.23%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.26%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-9.56%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-11.12%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-12.95%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-12.96%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.15%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MPWR's 0.54%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Dividend growth under 50% of MPWR's 0.35%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-43.19%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 319.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-83.44%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 433.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
85.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 572.74%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 209.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
35.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 156.08%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
293.27%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 2405.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
13.06%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1091.99%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
39.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 300.50%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
475.86%
Below 50% of MPWR's 3272.91%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
35.51%
Below 50% of MPWR's 345.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
49.34%
Below 50% of MPWR's 189.02%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
69.87%
Below 50% of MPWR's 393.48%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
55.24%
Below 50% of MPWR's 182.37%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
102.31%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 105.58%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
491.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 491.84% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
99.55%
Below 50% of MPWR's 290.87%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
37.31%
Below 50% of MPWR's 98.34%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-0.95%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 0.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
19.26%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.40%
Similar asset growth to MPWR's 8.15%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
4.45%
75-90% of MPWR's 5.88%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
11.53%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MPWR's 90.18%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
4.84%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 3.30%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
10.49%
SG&A growth well above MPWR's 7.17%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.