PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.47%
Positive revenue growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.64%
Positive gross profit growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.82%
Positive EBIT growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.96%
Positive operating income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
0.82%
Positive net income growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
0.53%
Positive EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.08%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MPWR's 0.54%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 33.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.60%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-126.40%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
80.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 496.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
21.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 180.72%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
41.12%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 123.41%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
152.14%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 353.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-17.56%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 215.57%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-17.95%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 43.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
216.94%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1314.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
31.88%
Below 50% of MPWR's 265.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
25.88%
Below 50% of MPWR's 211.06%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
74.95%
Below 50% of MPWR's 388.14%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
61.29%
Below 50% of MPWR's 182.49%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
110.37%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 104.30%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
342.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 342.27% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
99.75%
Below 50% of MPWR's 232.90%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
37.90%
Below 50% of MPWR's 86.55%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
4.21%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
13.41%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.88%
Positive asset growth while MPWR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.46%
1.25-1.5x MPWR's 2.98%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
10.79%
We have some new debt while MPWR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.84%
We increase R&D while MPWR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.74%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.