PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.02%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 7.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-3.26%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 6.41%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-3.40%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 20.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.06%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 20.69%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-0.75%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 21.77%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-0.53%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 20.95%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1.07%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 21.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.09%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while MPWR cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
38.46%
OCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 95.05%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
1040.43%
FCF growth above 1.5x MPWR's 80.70%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
68.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 476.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
13.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 163.18%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
19.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 72.28%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
103.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 1640.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-1.85%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 199.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
35.56%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 113.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
227.96%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1197.36%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
16.17%
Below 50% of MPWR's 240.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
27.56%
Below 50% of MPWR's 105.23%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
81.65%
Below 50% of MPWR's 386.28%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
68.77%
Below 50% of MPWR's 182.60%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
101.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to MPWR's 100.15%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
341.28%
Dividend/share CAGR of 341.28% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
99.61%
Below 50% of MPWR's 239.17%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
37.84%
Below 50% of MPWR's 100.33%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
1.02%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MPWR's 9.84%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
4.80%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.26%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 4.84%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.34%
75-90% of MPWR's 5.11%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
0.03%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MPWR's 21.30%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-1.26%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 1.73%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.95%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.