PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.04%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-13.64%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-18.51%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.97%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-19.78%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-20.21%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.46%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Reduced diluted shares while MPWR is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
4.88%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 2.05%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-0.67%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
75.57%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
61.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 471.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
15.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 162.03%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
1.24%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 83.49%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
91.92%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 302.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-5.86%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 185.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-8.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 81.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
220.89%
Below 50% of MPWR's 933.23%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
16.14%
Below 50% of MPWR's 210.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-17.80%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 112.81%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
87.00%
Below 50% of MPWR's 406.82%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
97.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 183.72%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
86.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MPWR's 99.75%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
333.29%
Dividend/share CAGR of 333.29% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
68.41%
Below 50% of MPWR's 242.21%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
27.57%
Below 50% of MPWR's 104.37%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-9.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 34.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.33%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.24%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 4.94%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.60%
Under 50% of MPWR's 5.06%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
5.05%
We have some new debt while MPWR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-2.34%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 10.30%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-3.10%
We cut SG&A while MPWR invests at 10.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.