PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 10.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.54%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MPWR's 11.15%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-2.20%
Negative EBIT growth while MPWR is at 22.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.95%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 22.04%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1.99%
Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 8.46%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
1.65%
EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 8.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.67%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 8.47%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.22%
Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.11%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.05%
Dividend reduction while MPWR stands at 37.19%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
54.47%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
319.48%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
36.34%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 489.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 197.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-15.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 62.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
138.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 337.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-10.13%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 183.32%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-25.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 36.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
93.78%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1146.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-11.27%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 329.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-40.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 71.12%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
93.15%
Below 50% of MPWR's 421.39%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
108.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 176.12%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
56.21%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 89.95%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
330.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 330.83% while MPWR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
68.63%
Below 50% of MPWR's 234.34%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
27.31%
Below 50% of MPWR's 122.62%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
2.39%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.56%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 7.77%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.47%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 2.69%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.14%
Under 50% of MPWR's 3.78%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-2.10%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 81.08%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.18%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 2.57%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.20%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MPWR's 6.34%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.