Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)

Revenue growth under 50% of MPWR's 22.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.

Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 22.41%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.

EBIT growth 50-75% of MPWR's 40.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.

Operating income growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 40.75%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.

Net income growth under 50% of MPWR's 43.90%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.

EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 43.69%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.

Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MPWR's 43.90%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.

Share count expansion well above MPWR's 0.14%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.

Diluted share count expanding well above MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

OCF growth under 50% of MPWR's 64.36%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.

Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 80.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 529.72%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.

5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 226.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.

Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 80.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 1051.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR is at 184.17%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 85.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Below 50% of MPWR's 923.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MPWR is 334.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 98.01%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

Below 50% of MPWR's 447.53%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.

5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MPWR's 184.42%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.

Below 50% of MPWR's 90.70%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.

Below 50% of MPWR's 736.34%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.

Below 50% of MPWR's 204.21%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.

Below 50% of MPWR's 102.30%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.

AR growth well above MPWR's 4.27%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.

Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 7.80%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.

Under 50% of MPWR's 6.94%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.