PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.47%
Negative revenue growth while MPWR stands at 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.47%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-11.63%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-11.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-11.53%
Negative net income growth while MPWR stands at 903.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.81%
Negative EPS growth while MPWR is at 913.51%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.56%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MPWR is at 912.88%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.11%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.11%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
4.58%
Dividend growth above 1.5x MPWR's 2.06%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
15.36%
Positive OCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
93.75%
Positive FCF growth while MPWR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
40.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 559.56%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 235.64%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-15.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 76.41%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
80.26%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 555.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
16.53%
Below 50% of MPWR's 147.52%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-14.12%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 467.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
67.62%
Below 50% of MPWR's 13038.74%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
15.21%
Below 50% of MPWR's 3922.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-42.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 1804.51%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
86.70%
Below 50% of MPWR's 629.34%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
94.14%
Below 50% of MPWR's 266.12%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
28.44%
Below 50% of MPWR's 141.48%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
299.73%
Below 50% of MPWR's 750.57%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
50.84%
Below 50% of MPWR's 198.53%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
18.30%
Below 50% of MPWR's 106.25%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-7.68%
Firm’s AR is declining while MPWR shows 41.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
5.38%
We show growth while MPWR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.53%
Asset growth well under 50% of MPWR's 26.70%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-2.01%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 34.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-6.71%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.20%
Our R&D shrinks while MPWR invests at 0.84%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
4.21%
SG&A growth well above MPWR's 1.03%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.