PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.55%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MPWR's 2.56%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-0.04%
Negative gross profit growth while MPWR is at 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-5.71%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-3.85%
Negative operating income growth while MPWR is at 3.34%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-2.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.27%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1.54%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.22%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.33%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.06%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while MPWR cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-57.51%
Negative OCF growth while MPWR is at 52.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-134.00%
Negative FCF growth while MPWR is at 110.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
48.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 608.51%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 257.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-15.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR stands at 63.76%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
60.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MPWR's 1236.18%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
2.07%
Below 50% of MPWR's 363.24%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-59.84%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MPWR stands at 131.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
106.27%
Below 50% of MPWR's 1733.59%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
2.74%
Below 50% of MPWR's 247.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-45.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MPWR is 63.14%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
81.59%
Below 50% of MPWR's 672.87%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
117.02%
Below 50% of MPWR's 273.24%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
18.72%
Below 50% of MPWR's 139.01%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
299.12%
Below 50% of MPWR's 737.00%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
50.60%
Below 50% of MPWR's 219.90%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
18.13%
Below 50% of MPWR's 101.97%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
77.72%
Our AR growth while MPWR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.53%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MPWR's 8.38%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-4.93%
Negative asset growth while MPWR invests at 5.22%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.73%
We have a declining book value while MPWR shows 4.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-5.50%
We’re deleveraging while MPWR stands at 11.55%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.30%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MPWR's 7.54%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.83%
We expand SG&A while MPWR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.