205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.95%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
6.95%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MRVL's 3.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-383.16%
Negative EBIT growth while MRVL is at 8.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-383.16%
Negative operating income growth while MRVL is at 15.99%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
90.00%
Positive net income growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.51%
Slight or no buybacks while MRVL is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.51%
Diluted share count expanding well above MRVL's 1.17%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
100.00%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while MRVL cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MRVL's 56.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
8.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MRVL's 109.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
8.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MRVL's 25.49%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.69%
Below 50% of MRVL's 653.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
163.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MRVL's 220.76%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
163.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of MRVL's 202.86%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
19.04%
Below 50% of MRVL's 54.87%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
19.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with MRVL's 19.67%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
19.04%
Positive short-term equity growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.